Fani Willis Fined $22,000 for Violating Georgia Open Records Laws

Fani Willis Fined $22,000 for Violating Georgia Open Records Laws

(DailyChive.com) – Fani Willis, Fulton County District Attorney, faces a hefty $22,000 fine for flouting Georgia’s open records laws, questioning the transparency of her office.

At a Glance

  • Fani Willis fined nearly $22,000 for violating open records laws.
  • Ordered to pay Judicial Watch’s legal fees and costs.
  • Judge cites failure to provide documents about January 6th events.
  • Judicial Watch claims Willis concealed political collusion records.

Court Imposes Fine for Legal Violations

The court fined Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis $21,578 after ruling she violated Georgia’s open records laws multiple times. This ruling followed a lawsuit by Judicial Watch, a conservative group seeking transparency in government dealings. They aimed to obtain documents detailing Willis’s interactions with special counsel Jack Smith and the House committee concerning January 6th.

Judge Robert McBurney stated Willis’s office ignored Judicial Watch’s open records request and falsely claimed no relevant records existed. He later discovered Willis’s office had a non-exempt letter to the January 6th committee head, which it initially denied having. The court criticized the lack of a search for records and ruled that such non-compliance has consequences, including potential liability for attorney’s fees.

Judicial Watch’s Pursuit of Truth

Judicial Watch’s lawsuit followed Willis’s denial of possessing relevant documents. However, once the court intervened, Willis’s office managed to identify some documents. Despite initially denying possession, Willis later acknowledged having relevant documents, claiming exemption from disclosure laws.

“Most basically, by operation of law Defendant acknowledged violating the ORA when she defaulted, But actual evidence proves the same: per her Records Custodian’s own admission, the District Attorney’s Office flatly ignored Plaintiff’s original ORA request, conducting no search and simply (and falsely) informing the County’s Open Records Custodian that no responsive records existed.” – McBurney

Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president, stated the court’s decision was correct, emphasizing the pursuit of truth about alleged political collusion with the January 6th committee. Judicial Watch indicated Willis made false assertions about the retention of relevant documents, highlighting the court’s critical stance on the transparency mandate imposed by open records laws.

Implications for Public Office Transparency

The ruling not only demands payment from Willis’s office but also emphasizes the imperative of transparency by public officials. Judicial Watch has requested a special master to search the agency’s files, pushing for comprehensive compliance with open records laws. Willis’s office must respond to this request by January 16th, and the fine must be paid by January 17th. Assessing the gravity of ignoring open records requests, the court reiterates the necessity for public officials to adhere strictly to transparency laws.

“The ORA is not hortatory; it is mandatory, Non-compliance has consequences. One of them can be liability for the requesting party’s attorney’s fees and costs of litigation.” – McBurney

The case serves as a stern reminder to all public entities of the repercussions of failing to maintain transparency and public trust. This instance marks a significant legal precedent for governmental accountability and the relentless pursuit of truth within the public sector.

Copyright 2025, DailyChive.com