(DailyChive.com) – The Justice Department’s proposal to restore gun rights for individuals with criminal convictions sparks heated debate over public safety and Second Amendment rights.
At a Glance
- The DOJ aims to restore gun rights to former convicts under set criteria.
- An interim final rule shifts authority from ATF to Attorney General Pam Bondi.
- ATF has lacked funding to process rights restoration since the 1990s.
- The proposal is part of President Trump’s executive branch gun policy review.
Proposal Overview
The Department of Justice (DOJ) introduces a new proposal exploring gun rights restoration for individuals with past criminal convictions. This initiative, stemming from an executive order, seeks to provide a pathway for former convicts to regain firearm rights under specific criteria. The current proposal will consider past criminal behavior and current law-abiding actions.
The proposal is controversial, balancing the Second Amendment with public safety. Federal law bars felons and individuals with domestic violence misdemeanors from gun possession, but the DOJ’s plan could offer those deemed non-dangerous a second chance at gun ownership. This discussion comes amid strong gun-rights activism, particularly concerned with non-violent felons.
Shifting Authority and Process
An interim final rule (IFR) transfers authority from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to Attorney General Pam Bondi. Bondi won’t delegate restoration to new agencies immediately but will suggest methods for securing funding to Congress. The IFR, set to take immediate effect with a 90-day window for public comment, bypasses the usual extensive notice-and-comment period.
“ATF, which currently has regulatory authority to act on applications made under 18 U.S.C. 925(c), has been forbidden from utilizing any of its appropriated funds for staffing to process requests by individuals for over 30 years.” – Pam Bondi.
The ATF’s preclusion from processing requests traces back decades, due to funding issues. This IFR marks a calculated step by the administration to circumvent past obstacles and potentially streamline procedures for reclaiming gun rights.
Controversy and Political Dynamics
The Trump administration’s efforts to address gun-rights advocacy, especially for non-violent offenders, have sparked debate. A notable incident involved the firing of a DOJ pardon attorney who refused to recommend restoration for Mel Gibson, highlighting internal discord.
“He then essentially explained to me that Mel Gibson has a personal relationship with President Trump and that should be sufficient basis for me to make a recommendation and that I would be wise to make the recommendation.” – Elizabeth G. Oyer.
This proposal reflects ongoing tensions between advancing Second Amendment rights and addressing public safety concerns. With the IFR immediately in force, it invites stakeholder engagement during a structured 90-day comment period, poised to provoke dialogue among policymakers and citizens.
Copyright 2025, DailyChive.com
