(DailyChive.com) – President of the Government Accountability Institute, Peter Schweizer, revealed that Democratic potential presidential nominee Kamala Harris has a history of protecting the interests of powerful elites.
Schweizer stated that Harris’ tenure as a prosecutor was marred by some “very frightening” activities, including showing “favoritism” towards criminal gangs and networks based on their political affiliations.
The conservative political consultant argued that he discussed the corruption of 2020 presidential candidates in his book Profiles in Corruption, where two chapters were solely dedicated to Biden and Harris. He further noted that Harris has previously covered up and downplayed some “pretty horrific crimes,” adding that she did not prosecute any sexual abuse cases involving Catholic priests while serving as San Francisco District Attorney.
Schweizer went on to say that Harris did not want to prosecute individuals and entities that donated to her campaigns and helped her clinch public offices.
According to Schweizer, multiple San Francisco Catholic churches and organizations were involved in these crimes, but Harris’ conflict of interest did not allow her to take any action against them.
When Harris ran for the San Francisco DA office against Terence Hallinan, her former boyfriend and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown funded her campaign to stop Hallinan’s rise, Schweizer added.
Brown did this to flee from the investigations that Hallinan launched against him for his involvement in a large number of criminal cases. After winning her election, Harris dropped multiple investigations against Brown, including sexual abuse cases.
Harris even refused to release Hallinan’s 800-page report against Brown and made the document disappear, which could have caused massive trouble for Brown and his numerous powerful political allies who contributed heavily to Democratic campaigns, Schweizer added.
Schweizer also asserted that San Francisco was the only large city in the United States, under Harris’ tenure, that did not prosecute any priestly abuse case. Schweizer concluded that Harris followed the same discriminatory approach as the Attorney General of California, which shows her tendency to protect the ugly elite for political gains.
Copyright 2024, DailyChive.com
