(DailyChive.com) – Fifteen states are challenging President Trump’s executive order to accelerate oil and gas projects, claiming it bypasses critical environmental protections and improperly uses emergency powers.
At a Glance
- A coalition of 15 states filed a lawsuit over Trump’s executive order declaring a “national energy emergency”
- The states argue the order unlawfully bypasses environmental protection laws that safeguard endangered species and cultural resources
- Trump’s order invokes the Defense Production Act and federal eminent domain to fast-track energy projects
- The lawsuit claims these emergency powers are being misused when U.S. energy production is already at record levels
- Led by Washington and California attorneys general, the states seek to have the order declared unlawful
States Unite Against Trump’s Energy Executive Order
A coalition of 15 states has launched a legal challenge against President Donald Trump’s recent executive order aimed at fast-tracking oil and gas projects across the nation. The lawsuit, filed in Washington state, directly challenges the president’s declaration of a “national energy emergency” issued on his first day in office. According to the legal filing, this declaration inappropriately leverages emergency powers typically reserved for natural disasters and genuine national crises to bypass established environmental review processes.
The states argue that Trump’s order directs federal agencies like the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Interior to circumvent required environmental reviews mandated by federal laws. These reviews are designed to protect endangered species, critical habitats, and cultural resources that could be irreparably damaged by rushed energy development. The lawsuit emphasizes that such shortcuts undermine decades of established environmental protections and threaten America’s natural heritage.
Emergency Powers for Non-Emergency Situations
At the center of the controversy is President Trump’s use of the Defense Production Act and federal eminent domain to promote oil and gas expansion. The lawsuit contends that these extraordinary powers are inappropriate when the nation faces no actual energy shortage. In fact, the attorneys general point out that American energy production is currently at an all-time high, undermining the justification for declaring an emergency.
“The Executive Order is unlawful, and its commands that federal agencies disregard the law and in many cases their own regulations to fast-track extensive categories of activities will result in damage to waters, wetlands, critical habitat, historic and cultural resources, endangered species, and the people and wildlife that rely on these precious resources”
The legal challenge, spearheaded by Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown and California Attorney General Rob Bonta, has garnered support from thirteen other states who share concerns about the precedent this executive order could set. Critics argue that while affordable energy is important, bypassing environmental safeguards risks long-term damage to natural resources that cannot be easily repaired once development begins.
States’ Rights and Environmental Protection
The attorneys general express particular concern about the impact on states’ rights, especially regarding their authority under the Clean Water Act. This federal law gives states significant power to protect their waterways from pollution and environmental degradation. By using emergency powers to override these established processes, the Trump administration potentially undermines the federalist balance that has long governed environmental regulation in America.
“The shortcuts inherent in rushing through emergency processes fundamentally undermine the rights of States”
The coalition is asking a federal judge to declare the executive order unlawful and prevent federal agencies from using emergency permitting procedures for non-emergency projects. As of filing, the White House has not issued any official comment on the lawsuit. This case represents the latest in a series of legal challenges to the administration’s energy policies, highlighting the ongoing tension between economic development and environmental conservation in American politics.
Copyright 2025, DailyChive.com
