Uncovering California’s “Zone Zero”: Fire Prevention in High-Risk Regions

Uncovering California's "Zone Zero": Fire Prevention in High-Risk Regions

(DailyChive.com) – California’s path to adopting “zone zero” fire prevention measures remains unfinished, amidst persistent wildfire threats.

At a Glance

  • California’s 2020 law mandates removal of flammable materials within 5 feet of homes in fire-prone areas.
  • Implementation of the “zone zero” regulations is delayed, no timeline set for completion by the state Board of Forestry and Fire Protection.
  • Wildfires like Eaton and Palisades emphasize the urgent need for regulation.
  • The Board is in “pre-rulemaking phase,” seeking financial resources for the initiative.
  • Governor Gavin Newsom proposes $25 million to assist homeowners in establishing “zone zero” areas.

Zone Zero: Fire Prevention Delayed

California took a significant step in 2020 by passing a law aimed at reducing wildfire damage through “zone zero” regulations. This legislation requires eliminating combustible materials such as vegetation, wood piles, and other flammable substances within a 5-foot radius of residential buildings in high-risk areas.

While these regulations are pivotal, the official adoption has faced setbacks. The Board of Forestry and Fire Protection is yet to finalize these rules due to procedural and budgetary challenges, with no formal timeline for their completion.

Despite bipartisan support and a pressing need revealed by recent wildfires like Eaton and Palisades, progress remains insufficient. Legislators, including State Senator Henry Stern, have expressed their frustration with the protracted timelines. “It’s frustrating at every level of government,” Senator Stern lamented. As these setbacks continue, homes remain vulnerable to the threat of embers, responsible for the destruction of 90% of structures during wildfires, according to experts and officials.

Financial Hurdles and Legislative Dissatisfaction

The lack of adequate funding is a major obstacle confronting the “zone zero” initiative. The Board of Forestry and Fire Protection is currently in what is termed the “pre-rulemaking phase,” a stage critical for acquiring financial resources necessary to offset prospective costs of the regulations.
Meanwhile, Governor Gavin Newsom has proposed an allocation of $25 million, derived from a $10 billion climate change bond, to support homeowners in creating these fire-resistant zones.

“I hope that the state acts with the urgency that the issue and these guidelines deserve” – U.S. Rep. Laura Friedman

The delay in implementation has sparked dissatisfaction among lawmakers who initially championed the law. U.S. Representative Laura Friedman, a leading force behind the legislation, vocalized her unease with the situation, emphasizing that state officials need to respond promptly to ensure communities are better protected against wildfires.

Local Adoption and Future Prospects

Despite state-wide delays, individual homeowners and cities are proactively adopting “zone zero” measures, setting a benchmark for others. Once the regulations are enacted, new homes must immediately comply, while existing residences will have a three-year transition period.

Proponents of the law highlight that adopting these safety measures could greatly reduce wildfire-related destruction, building resilience within vulnerable communities.

“We feel really strongly that it would” – Steve Hawks

The law’s delayed implementation underscores broader challenges in resource allocation and procedural advancement in addressing systemic issues like wildfire prevention. Public awareness and continued pressure on legislators might prove instrumental in overcoming these hurdles, ensuring timely implementation. The fight against wildfires in California is ongoing, and the “zone zero” measures could be a crucial component of a more comprehensive strategy to safeguard lives and properties.

Copyright 2025, DailyChive.com