Netanyahu FUNDED Hamas — Then Attacks Killed 1,200

(DailyChive.com) – A 2025 Israeli intelligence investigation reveals that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu knowingly funded Hamas with hundreds of millions of dollars while ignoring explicit warnings of an imminent attack—raising profound questions about whether political objectives trumped national security in the lead-up to October 7, 2023.

Story Snapshot

Netanyahu approved $30 million monthly cash transfers to Hamas from 2018-2023 despite knowing funds would strengthen military capabilities
Shin Bet chief explicitly warned Netanyahu five months before October 7 attack of impending Hamas threat at Israel’s doorstep
2025 Shin Bet investigation identifies Netanyahu’s funding policy as key failure precipitating attacks that killed 1,200 Israelis
Netanyahu publicly stated in 2019 that supporting Hamas transfers was necessary to prevent Palestinian statehood

Policy Over Security: The Funding Arrangement

Between 2018 and October 2023, Netanyahu’s government facilitated the transfer of approximately $30 million monthly in Qatari cash to Hamas-controlled Gaza. Israeli security officials personally escorted Qatari diplomats carrying suitcases of $100 bills through the Rafah Crossing each month. The arrangement formalized after Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas stopped funding Gaza in 2018, leaving Hamas financially vulnerable. Rather than allowing the PA to return, Netanyahu chose to prop up Hamas with foreign money, fundamentally altering the region’s power dynamics.

Strategic Calculations and Public Statements

Netanyahu’s motivations became clear through his own words and those of his political allies. In 2019, he told a Likud faction meeting that supporting Hamas fund transfers was necessary to prevent Palestinian statehood. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich had characterized the PA as “a burden” and Hamas as “an asset” years earlier in 2015. Researcher Adam Raz from the Akevot Institute explains that Netanyahu’s priority was preventing conflict resolution through land division or a two-state solution, not maintaining security. By keeping Hamas and Fatah financially separated, Netanyahu maintained there was “no partner for peace.”

New Podcast

Tucker Carlson
October 7th Foresight, Netanyahu’s Funding of Hamas, and the Settlers Murdering Palestinians

🤯 Oct 7 roots in 2021 clashes & Hamas rise—Sinwar's long game, reactive chaos, no grand strategy. Fear grips both. Thoughts? #Israel #Gaza

Link in reply… pic.twitter.com/dEiIB5M2CY

— Transcripted.AI (@TranscriptedAI) April 13, 2026

Ignored Intelligence Warnings

In May 2023, Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar explicitly warned Netanyahu of an impending Hamas threat, calling it a “challenge at Israel’s doorstep.” The warning came just five months before the October 7 attacks that killed at least 1,200 Israelis in the deadliest single day in the nation’s history. Despite this direct intelligence assessment from Israel’s internal security agency, Netanyahu maintained the funding policy and took no preventive action. The prime minister later claimed to the Knesset’s defense committee that there was no foresight of the attacks, contradicting documented warnings from his own security chief.

Investigation Findings and Flawed Assumptions

The 2025 Shin Bet investigation concluded that Netanyahu’s policy allowing Qatari money into Gaza was one of the key failures precipitating the October 7 attacks. Investigators found that Hamas siphoned funds intended for civilian services to its military wing, freeing the organization’s budget for weapons and tunnel construction. Former Israeli Defence Ministry official Amos Gilad admitted the underlying assumption was fundamentally wrong: “If you fed them with money, they would be tamed.” The opposite occurred—the funding enabled unprecedented military expansion that culminated in coordinated attacks across southern Israel.

Political Consequences and Accountability Questions

The revelations have intensified calls for independent investigation into Netanyahu’s decision-making processes. The funding arrangement raises troubling questions about state responsibility for strengthening designated terrorist organizations and whether political objectives—preventing Palestinian statehood—were prioritized over citizen safety. For Americans watching their own government navigate complex foreign policy while billions in taxpayer dollars flow overseas, this case study illustrates how political calculations by leaders can override security imperatives with catastrophic results. The attack eliminated internal Israeli opposition to Netanyahu’s rule and postponed peace negotiations indefinitely, raising questions about who truly benefited from the policy failures.

Broader Implications for Government Accountability

This case reveals a pattern familiar to citizens across the political spectrum: government officials making decisions that serve political survival rather than public welfare. Netanyahu’s documented strategy of funding a terrorist organization to prevent political compromise, then ignoring intelligence warnings about the predictable consequences, exemplifies governance failures that transcend partisan divides. Whether the issue is funding foreign militants, ignoring border security warnings, or prioritizing political objectives over citizen safety, the underlying problem remains consistent—leaders more concerned with maintaining power than fulfilling their fundamental duty to protect those they govern. The October 7 attacks and subsequent investigation stand as a stark reminder of what happens when political calculations replace sound security policy.