(DailyChive.com) – Trump’s plan to slash Grad PLUS loans could devastate America’s future physician workforce just as the nation faces a critical doctor shortage of 86,000 by 2036.
Key Takeaways
- Trump’s FY 2026 budget proposal would eliminate Grad PLUS loans and cap professional student borrowing at $150,000—less than half the cost of medical school
- Over 75% of medical students rely on federal loans, with 2024 graduates averaging $212,341 in debt
- The $34.7 billion saved from cutting Grad PLUS loans would help fund tax cuts while potentially worsening the projected physician shortage
- Medical organizations warn these changes would disproportionately harm low-income and minority students pursuing medical careers
- Republicans claim the cuts will pressure schools to lower tuition, while medical institutions argue this is unrealistic given rising operational costs
Medical Education Under Attack
The Trump administration’s FY 2026 budget proposal takes direct aim at America’s future doctors with sweeping cuts to graduate student loan programs. At the center of this controversial plan is the complete elimination of Graduate PLUS loans, which currently allow medical students to borrow up to the full cost of attendance minus other financial aid. This program has been a lifeline for aspiring physicians, with over 75% of medical students depending on federal loans to finance their education and 2024 graduates carrying an average debt burden of $212,341.
Perhaps most alarming is the proposed $150,000 cap on total federal borrowing for professional programs—a figure that wouldn’t even cover half the current median cost of attending a public medical school, which stands at $286,000. The American Medical Association has sounded the alarm that these changes would create an insurmountable financial barrier for countless qualified students, particularly those from middle and lower-income backgrounds who lack family wealth to fill the gap.
Budget Cuts for Tax Cuts
The administration’s justification for these drastic measures reveals the true priorities at play. Republicans claim the $34.7 billion saved from eliminating Grad PLUS loans would help fund tax reductions, effectively transferring resources from future healthcare providers to current high-income earners. This comes alongside other controversial budget cuts, including $300 million from SNAP food assistance and Medicaid restrictions projected to remove healthcare coverage from 14 million Americans—creating a perfect storm of reduced healthcare access.
“The elimination of the Grad PLUS loan program would have devastating consequences for medical education and healthcare in the United States,” warns the Association of American Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. “The proposed $150,000 cap wouldn’t cover even one year at many medical schools, forcing students to rely on private loans with higher interest rates and fewer protections.”
Worsening the Doctor Shortage Crisis
These proposed cuts couldn’t come at a worse time for America’s healthcare system. The nation already faces a projected shortage of up to 86,000 physicians by 2036, with rural and underserved communities bearing the brunt of this crisis. By making medical education financially unattainable for many qualified students, the administration risks exacerbating this shortage precisely when an aging population will require more healthcare services than ever before.
The Asian Pacific American Medical Student Association has emphasized that these changes would disproportionately impact low-income and minority students, further undermining efforts to create a physician workforce that reflects America’s diverse population. With 33% of medical students coming from Pell-eligible backgrounds, the additional proposed reductions to Pell Grant funding would create yet another obstacle for economically disadvantaged students pursuing medical careers.
The False Promise of Lower Tuition
The administration’s claim that restricting federal loans will pressure institutions to lower tuition costs doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. While citing a 2023 National Bureau of Economic Research paper suggesting Grad PLUS increased costs without improving access, they ignore the economic realities facing medical schools. Though median MD program tuition decreased slightly from $53,582 in 2020 to $50,218 in 2025, living expenses rose 11% to $21,950 annually, reflecting broader inflation trends beyond schools’ control.
Medical schools have countered that significant tuition reductions are unrealistic given rising operational costs, including faculty salaries, research facilities, and clinical training expenses. The proposed loan caps would particularly harm primary care providers and those planning to serve in underserved communities—the very physicians America needs most. Students forced to rely on private loans would face higher interest rates, fewer repayment protections, and greater overall debt burdens.
A Threat to America’s Healthcare Future
The implications of these proposed cuts extend far beyond individual student finances. With 72% of current medical students relying on federal loans, these changes threaten to reshape the entire physician workforce at a critical juncture. Students from middle-class backgrounds without substantial family wealth would face impossible choices: take on high-interest private debt, abandon their medical career aspirations, or accumulate credit card debt just to cover basic living expenses during their intensive training.
“Federal student loan changes would worsen the physician shortage at a time when our nation can least afford it,” states the American Medical Association. “These proposals create unnecessary barriers to medical education that will ultimately harm patient access to care, particularly in rural and economically disadvantaged communities already struggling to attract physicians.”
As the debate over the FY 2026 budget continues, the stark contrast in priorities couldn’t be clearer. While the administration frames these cuts as promoting fiscal responsibility and educational cost control, medical organizations see them as a direct threat to healthcare access and quality for generations of Americans. The question remains whether lawmakers will prioritize tax cuts for today’s wealthy or invest in tomorrow’s essential healthcare workforce.
Copyright 2025, DailyChive.com
